Categories: News

No third-party cookies for the New York Times readers

The New York Times is preparing to give up the third-party cookies. In an interview for Digiday, The Times’ svp of ad innovation Allison Murphy mentioned they were working for “a third-party cookie-less future”.

How the market will be without third-party cookies

The New York Times decided to prioritize its subscriptions a few years ago. Then, it grew up to 6.5 million paid subscribers. Thus, it allowed its marketing team to plan and change for a future without third-party cookies.

When the coronavirus crisis began, 44% of its ad sales just disappeared. So, Allison Murphy, the Times senior vice-president, says that the company eliminated the ads popping up, as there “were crap.” Also, they used to cause “technical delays and hiccups.”

Thus, the company managed to clean its websites and only has a couple ads per page that operate smoothly. Moreover, she emphasized that they come from brands that the publisher knows.

Although this affected revenues, “we can make some of those hard choices knowing that there is a long sustainable path to a sustainable business,” Murphy mentioned.

So, when the third-party cookies will be gone for good, Muprhy says that her team will focus on first-party alternative solutions.

”The space we have to play in is helping [brands] build a relationship with the audience they care most about,” she added. Murphy also emphasized that the option for buying and selling ads will soon become unavailable, as the third-party cookie will soon disappear.

A bet on contextual advertising

In 2018, the Times data science team created new contextual classifications of the content. So, it included the emotional progress of a story, topic targeting and the motivations of the audience after reading it.

Then, it placed the tags on the content the content generated. Thus, it could dig further and find what users wanted to see.

But Muprhy thinks that in order to do this, there is a need for an honest conversations with brands. So, advertisers should understand that they can not target users based on a specific job, age and gender using banners, for instance.

Laurentiu Titei

Laurentiu, a creative content writer, has been producing articles about technology for more than 10 years. He is interested in all the security and internet news and his mainstream media background helps make them readable for all kinds of users. Moreover, he grows the appropriate social media channels for websites.

View Comments

Recent Posts

Digital Advertising practices, under the pressure of fines

Its digital advertising practices continue to bring troubles for Google. Two separate cases will go to court in the UK…

2 years ago

Advertising discrimination, addressed by huge companies

WPP, Delta Airlines, Kellogg and Mindshare take the issue of advertising discrimination seriously, in order to combat bias in digital…

2 years ago

Ad fraud might hit $100B, advertising companies worry

Ad fraud has become a very big issue for both users and the advertising agencies. Different forms of it might…

3 years ago

The ad-based business model: Would Facebook change it?

The Facebook lead architect of the ad-based business model leaves the company. Let's see how her move could affect company's…

3 years ago

Here it comes: New Meta privacy policy. Does it matter?

A new Meta privacy policy comes soon for the company's platforms. Users would be notified of the updates about how…

3 years ago

Advertising company: ”Our customers don’t like ads”

As its “customers don't like ads,” Evite, an American online party planner, decided to just close its advertising business, while…

3 years ago